On June 6th, President Donald Trump made a surprise visit to the Federal Reserve headquarters renovation site in Washington, D.C., donning a hard hat and touring two key buildings—Marriner S. Eccles and the East Building—accompanied by Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The visit comes amid intense public scrutiny over the hefty $2.5 billion renovation project, scheduled for completion in 2027.
During the site tour, Trump renewed his criticism, claiming that total costs had ballooned to $3.1 billion—a figure Powell immediately refuted in front of the press. According to Powell, that amount includes prior repairs to the William McChesney Martin Building, which had already been completed, and not part of the ongoing renovations. Fed’s official documents confirm the cost for Eccles and East buildings remains at $2.5 billion.
However, Trump’s aides insist that all three buildings should be counted in the total to reflect the real scale of the investment, accusing Powell of “statistical obfuscation.” The presence of prominent Republicans including Senators Tim Scott and Thom Tillis further underlined the White House’s growing concern over this massive government expenditure.
Beyond the budget dispute, Trump once again pressed Powell to lower interest rates, saying he had raised the issue during a private conversation that day. Nevertheless, Trump clarified he has no intention of firing Powell, a move he had previously hinted at, and framed the visit as a means of overseeing the project's progress and budget usage.
“All I want is for him to cut rates—that would be best,” Trump said to the press, giving Powell a pat on the back in front of reporters.
The site visit occurred just a week before the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, where interest rate decisions will be made. Trump’s timing clearly reflects his ongoing attempt to pressure the Fed’s decision-making. However, Powell and his team emphasized that the renovation costs stem largely from necessary upgrades: improved security protocols, asbestos removal, groundwater issues, and soil contamination—factors that have pushed up construction costs.
To respond to criticisms, the Fed published a detailed breakdown of the project online and emphasized the buildings in question haven’t undergone major renovations since the 1930s and now require “significant structural restoration.”
Moving forward, Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to face increasing political and legal pressure from both the White House and Congress. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called for a “comprehensive internal audit” of the Fed’s operations. Meanwhile, some Trump allies have filed lawsuits alleging a lack of transparency in the Fed’s monetary policy meetings.
Representatives Dan Meuser and Anna Paulina Luna have even called on the Department of Justice to investigate Powell personally, although experts deem such actions unlikely to proceed.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has expressed disappointment with Powell and proposed amending the Federal Reserve Act of 1913—a move that, if realized, could reshape the Fed’s governance for decades to come.
Senator Tim Scott, who has persistently questioned the Fed’s construction budget in recent hearings, sent a formal letter demanding Powell clarify discrepancies between his testimony, public reports, and the data on the Fed’s official website by August 8.
Despite mounting scrutiny and political maneuvering, Powell remains firm in his defense of the renovation and cautious monetary stance. But with the 2025 election cycle heating up, Trump and his allies are expected to maintain pressure—not only on spending but also on how the Fed sets interest rates.
As tensions escalate between the executive branch and the central bank, this confrontation may reshape the boundaries of political influence over monetary policy. The outcome could have lasting implications for the Fed’s independence and the U.S. economy at large.
Tiếng Việt
English
