China’s retail market is undergoing an unprecedented price war, driven by major e-commerce giants and a shift in consumer behavior. While it benefits customers in the short term, the long-term effects on businesses and the broader economy are raising concerns across the board.
Over the past few years, major players like Alibaba, JD.com, and Meituan have aggressively expanded their instant retail services—ultra-fast deliveries of goods and meals within hours. These services, coupled with massive subsidies, have transformed consumer expectations. Coffee for 10.9 yuan, dumplings for 13 yuan, or a McDonald’s breakfast for just over 26 yuan delivered to your door are now commonplace in urban China.
Industry experts estimate that the size of China’s instant retail sector could reach 2 trillion yuan ($279 billion) by 2030. To stake their claims in this future market, leading platforms have already spent nearly 200 billion yuan ($28 billion) in subsidies to attract users and dominate the landscape.
However, these steep discounts come at a cost. Shares of Meituan and JD.com have fallen 22% and 10% respectively in 2025, reflecting investor concerns about shrinking profit margins. According to Nomura, JD.com lost over 10 billion yuan in Q2 2025 alone as it attempted to break into Meituan’s stronghold—the food delivery market.
Despite mounting losses, platforms are pressing forward. “This battle is about the next five to ten years,” said tech analyst Ed Sander. “The platforms believe it’s a fight for survival that will determine their future.”
Slowing consumer spending, a rising middle class demanding convenience, and increasing competition from foreign firms have pushed companies to invest heavily in automation, AI, and instant delivery logistics. But this strategy creates a paradox: cutting prices is necessary to retain market share, but prolonged discounts undermine profitability.
Small businesses, retail shop owners, and food vendors are also suffering. Many report razor-thin margins or no profits at all. Meanwhile, traditional restaurants are losing customers to online promotions and delivery deals.
Beijing is taking notice. The term “involution”—used to describe excessive, self-destructive competition—has gained traction in Chinese media. Xinhua News Agency has openly criticized the current retail model as unsustainable, referring to “zero yuan purchases” and a growing “bubble market.”
In May 2025, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) summoned JD.com, Meituan, and Alibaba’s Ele.me to address the issue, urging fair competition. On July 24, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) released a draft amendment to pricing laws, which includes provisions against predatory pricing and unfair use of data, algorithms, and technology.
The draft law, open for public consultation until August 23, introduces a clause prohibiting companies from pressuring partners to sell below cost—broadening the scope of anti-dumping rules.
While Chinese consumers are enjoying cheaper goods and faster services, the long-term consequences are less optimistic. Price expectations are now skewed, and some customers hesitate to buy big-ticket items like cars, fearing future price drops.
Service quality has become inconsistent, and rushed deliveries have raised safety concerns. Food waste is also on the rise, with unsold items discarded due to overstocking and lack of demand.
Moreover, this aggressive pricing environment is destabilizing entire sectors. Workers in logistics, retail, and supply chains face unpredictable income and job insecurity. The Chinese government worries that declining wages, reduced tax revenues, and weakened business sustainability could ultimately harm the economy.
China’s 19-trillion-dollar economy posted a healthy 5.3% growth rate in H1 2025. Yet cracks are showing. Retail sales growth slowed from 6.4% in May to 4.8% in June, and deflation looms. ANZ forecasts a 0.1% drop in CPI and a 3% decline in PPI this year—China’s first deflationary period since 2009.
As Professor Bala Ramasamy of CEIBS in Shanghai points out: “Price wars rarely produce winners. They may benefit consumers temporarily, but they worsen deflationary expectations and hurt the overall economy. The government must intervene for the greater good.”
In short, while the battle for retail dominance may offer convenience and value today, the sustainability of such a model remains in question. Without regulatory balance and responsible innovation, no one truly wins in a race to the bottom.
Tiếng Việt
English
